16-Trillion in debt and counting...

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

IRS DEFEAT...

By The Tribune-Review
Sunday, April 19, 2015, 9:00 p.m.

 

Attempting to obscure the extent of its alleged targeting of conservative groups, the Internal Revenue Service has been smacked with a serious setback in its court fight in Ohio.

A federal judge granted a motion compelling the IRS to list the 298 targeted organizations, which the IRS had identified for the Treasury Department inspector general. In a lawsuit filed in 2013, 10 conservative groups, through discovery, have been trying to pry free the list of all groups targeted by the IRS. This, in order to seek class certification and expand the lawsuit to “all the organizations on (ex-IRS official) Lois Lerner's hit list,” writes Hans von Spakovsky of The Heritage Foundation.

The IRS and the Justice Department had tried to keep a lid on this boiling pot by arguing that a federal statute protects the confidentiality of tax-return information. But had Justice lawyers more carefully read the law, they would have found that the statute includes an exemption for tax information “directly related to an issue in” a judicial proceeding, according to Judge Susan Dlott. The identities of all targeted organizations are directly related to this case, she said.

As a result, the IRS has been ordered to turn over all charts, lists and spreadsheets of groups that had tax-exemption applications “flagged” by the IRS.

The discernible rumbling of distant thunder portends the gathering storm that is going to rain down on the IRS.

Read more: http://triblive.com/opinion/editorials/8179201-74/irs-groups-gathering#ixzz3YAn00urP 
Follow us: @triblive on Twitter | triblive on Facebook

SIGNING WITHOUT LIABILITY

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Next time you sign a agreement to have your lawyer re-present you BY ALL MEANS do this "WITHOUT PREJUDICE" before your signature!!!

I hope that everyone realizes that UNCONDITIONAL signature creates an NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT. Now it wouldn't if we still were under common law, but under the current Law Merchant, UCC, an unconditional signature makes you subject to IMPLIIED liability. As UCC-3-104 says:

§ 3-104. NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT.

"(a) Except as provided in subsections (c) and (d), "negotiable instrument" means an unconditional promise or order to pay a fixed amount of money, with or without interest or other charges described in the promise or order,..."

“Without Prejudice” UCC 1-207 (308) means “that which is so clearly stated or distinctly set forth that there is no doubt as to its meaning.” Negotiable Instrument Law UCC 3-104.2 states that a summons, license, or draft ‘must’ be signed “unconditionally.”

A reservation of Without Prejudice places a condition on the agreement which means ‘I do not partake’, the unit is now non-assumpsit. These units are “unconscionable” at UCC 2-302.

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

"Law phrase. Without abandonment of claim, right, privilege and without implied admission of liability."

http://thelawdictionary.org/without-prejudice/

So by adding "Without prejudice" before your signature, you're asserting your right NOT to be liable for anything that WAS NOT disclosed to you at the time of signing. I.e. that makes your signature CONDITIONAL, meaning that when they say you're liable to do this, or are subject to this statute, you can say "I reserved my rights NOT to agree to anything that was not disclosed, and at the time of signing you DID NOT say that signing makes me subject to your statute(s)".

Of course they can refuse your application if you sign that way. And guess what, THAT is a PROOF that rights reservation protects your rights! And in regard to any past forms that you signed unconditionally, you can AMEND those, by sending them a note that you're amending your application form(s) by adding the words "without prejudice" before your signature.

They might ignore that, but that should reserve your rights. They also might revoke the benefit that you applied for, since you no longer are liable to obey the rules that come with that benefit. So ULTIMATELY we have to start using lawful money such as US coins and pay with other things of value, because if they revoke our gov't benefits, we need to assert our rights under EQUITY, and you can't do that if you "pay" for everything with green paper.

BTW, these rules apply to negotiable instruments:

When there are disputes as to the terms of an instrument, the following rules govern

1. Handwriting prevails over typewriting and print

2. Typewriting prevails over print

3. Words prevail over numbers

4. Can be postdated, antedated, or undated

Here's an excellent book about using "without prejudice":

http://www.amazon.com/Without-Prejudice-UCC-1-207-Sovereign/dp/1414017359/ref=sr_1_2

And the attached doc below is also a great explanation of asserting your rights. I just don't agree with the author about the meaning of the phrase USA, as that was the very name of our Constitutional Republic, first used in the Declaration of Independence. He's also delusional with his rant against oaths, claiming that's some religious ceremony. It's not, oaths are BONDS and they are properly used. For example under common law, complaints are bonded by swearing under penalty of perjury. So if the guy lies, then he'll be facing criminal charges. If the swearing was not required then anyone could MAKE UP lies about you, and so make you waste time and money defending against his lies.

Here's a part of that doc:

"Let's go back to the Article I Legislative and Article II Executive Branches to discover the mischief of legalized piracy and conspiracy upon the innocent People of the land.  

This is how it works: We initiate the 'engraft' Interlocking Directorates by agency fiat of 'unconscionable' contract, license, and enrollments. The signing at UCC 3-104.1, which if "unconditional", at UCC 3-104.2 gives agency police power to access your property by executing negotiable "dishonored" instruments of "promise" per UCC 3-104.3. This applies to all “persons”, such as, all commercial entities, corporations, governments, and every other “thing” that legally falls into the description of “person”, but not the Freeborn People.

All "IMPLIED POWERS" are "vested" by the Negotiable Instrument Law and enforced by the Uniform Commercial Code at 3-104 (1) Signing, and (2) Unconditional, and (3) Promise.

Negotiable Instruments of the categories of W-2 forms, Marriage Licenses, Driver License, Dog License, Social Security License (#123-45-6789), etc., etc., presumed to be voluntary, knowingly, willingly and intentionally signed by the Citizen, initiate the "implied powers" of the Article I Legislative Branch to be "engrafted" upon Article II Executive to collect the tax with "implied" police power, but offers no delict to destroy diversity of Citizenship. The dolus bogus "contract" initiating Article II Executive police power, together with Article I Legislative "statutes" as the other "implied" power creates third party instruments "presumed" to obligate the parties signed upon any such "contracts"."

 EXHIBIT_020_-_NOTICE_Penumbra_Doctrine_Does_NOT_Apply.doc

BTW, as this is all about negotiable instruments under the UCC, then even if we don't reserve our rights, we can assert our UCC rights, i.e. demand that they 1) identify themselves (by name and DOB of the person/agency), and 2) produce proof of their authority, and of their Holder in Due Course status.

I.e. every time that an agent of some muni corporation demands payment or performance, it might be considered a PRESENTMENT under UCC 3-501.

SOCIAL SECURITY SCAM...

Well, Well, Well, it looks like someone thoroughly checked this out! I was wondering who was going to do research into President Obama's Social Security number. 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Jean Paul Luwig or Barack Hussein Obama?  
 SSN#042-68-4425

< /div>

WOW, read this, it's short - very interesting. 

An  intensive 6-year investigation has revealed  the  identity of the man whose Social Security Number (SSN) is being used by President Obama.

Jean  Paul Ludwig, who was born in France in 1890,  immigrated  to the United States in 1924, and was assigned SSN 042-68-4425 (President Obama's current SSN) rec'd  on or about March 1977.

Mr. Ludwig lived most of his adult life in Connecti cut .  Because of that, his SSN begins with the digits 042, which are among only a select few  reserved for  Connecticut residents. 

Barack  H. Obama never lived or worked in that state!  Therefore, there is no reason on earth for his SSN to start with the digits 042. None whatsoever!

Now comes the best pa rt! J. P.  Ludwig spent the final months of his life  in  Hawaii, where he died.
Conveniently,  Obama 's grandmother, Madelyn Payne Dunham,worked part-time in the Probate Office in the Honolulu Hawaii Courthouse, and therefore  had  access to the SSNs of deceased individuals. 

The Social Security Administration was  never  informed of Ludwig's death, and because he never received Social Security benefits there were  no  benefits to stop and therefore, no questions were ever raised.  The  suspicion, of course, is that Dunham, knowing  her  grandson  was not a U.S. Citizen, either because he was born in Kenya, or became a c itizen  of Indonesia  upon his adoption by Lolo Soetoro,  simply scoured the probate records, until  she found someone, who died who was not receiving  Social  Security benefits, and selected Mr.  Ludwig’s Connecticut SSN for her grandson Barry Obama.

Just  wait until the head Birther  himself,  Donald  Trump, gets past the birth certificate and onto the issue of Barry O 's  use< b>  of a stolen SSN. You will see  leftist  heads  exploding, because they will have no way of defending Obama.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Although many Americans  do  not understand the meaning of  the  term  "natural  born", there are few who do not understand that if  you  are using someone else 's SSN it is a  clear  indication of fraud, and a federal offense.  Let 's all get this information  out to  everybody on our mailing lists.  If the  voters  of this great nation can succeed in bringing this lying, deceitful, cheating, corrupt, impostor to justice it will be the  biggest  and best news in decades for our country and the world

If you can just say  "oh well; ho hum" after reading this  you  get what you deserve .

"In God We  Trust."