WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Next time you sign a agreement to have your lawyer re-present you BY ALL MEANS do this "WITHOUT PREJUDICE" before your signature!!!
I hope that everyone realizes that UNCONDITIONAL signature
creates an NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT. Now it wouldn't if we still were under common
law, but under the current Law Merchant, UCC, an unconditional signature makes
you subject to IMPLIIED liability. As UCC-3-104 says:
§ 3-104. NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT.
"(a) Except as provided in subsections (c) and (d),
"negotiable instrument" means an unconditional promise or order to
pay a fixed amount of money, with or without interest or other charges
described in the promise or order,..."
“Without Prejudice” UCC 1-207 (308) means “that which is so
clearly stated or distinctly set forth that there is no doubt as to its
meaning.” Negotiable Instrument Law UCC 3-104.2 states that a summons, license,
or draft ‘must’ be signed “unconditionally.”
A reservation of Without Prejudice places a condition on the
agreement which means ‘I do not partake’, the unit is now non-assumpsit. These
units are “unconscionable” at UCC 2-302.
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
"Law phrase. Without abandonment of claim, right,
privilege and without implied admission of liability."
http://thelawdictionary.org/without-prejudice/
So by adding "Without prejudice" before your
signature, you're asserting your right NOT to be liable for anything that WAS
NOT disclosed to you at the time of signing. I.e. that makes your signature
CONDITIONAL, meaning that when they say you're liable to do this, or are
subject to this statute, you can say "I reserved my rights NOT to agree to
anything that was not disclosed, and at the time of signing you DID NOT say
that signing makes me subject to your statute(s)".
Of course they can refuse your application if you sign that
way. And guess what, THAT is a PROOF that rights reservation protects your
rights! And in regard to any past forms that you signed unconditionally, you
can AMEND those, by sending them a note that you're amending your application
form(s) by adding the words "without prejudice" before your
signature.
They might ignore that, but that should reserve your rights.
They also might revoke the benefit that you applied for, since you no longer
are liable to obey the rules that come with that benefit. So ULTIMATELY we have
to start using lawful money such as US coins and pay with other things of value,
because if they revoke our gov't benefits, we need to assert our rights under
EQUITY, and you can't do that if you "pay" for everything with green
paper.
BTW, these rules apply to negotiable instruments:
When there are disputes as to the terms of an instrument,
the following rules govern
1. Handwriting prevails over typewriting and print
2. Typewriting prevails over print
3. Words prevail over numbers
4. Can be postdated, antedated, or undated
Here's an excellent book about using "without prejudice":
http://www.amazon.com/Without-Prejudice-UCC-1-207-Sovereign/dp/1414017359/ref=sr_1_2
And the attached doc below is also a great explanation of
asserting your rights. I just don't agree with the author about the meaning of
the phrase USA, as that was the very name of our Constitutional Republic, first
used in the Declaration of Independence. He's also delusional with his rant
against oaths, claiming that's some religious ceremony. It's not, oaths are
BONDS and they are properly used. For example under common law, complaints are
bonded by swearing under penalty of perjury. So if the guy lies, then he'll be
facing criminal charges. If the swearing was not required then anyone could
MAKE UP lies about you, and so make you waste time and money defending against
his lies.
Here's a part of that doc:
"Let's go back to the Article I Legislative and Article
II Executive Branches to discover the mischief of legalized piracy and
conspiracy upon the innocent People of the land.
This is how it works: We initiate the 'engraft' Interlocking
Directorates by agency fiat of 'unconscionable' contract, license, and
enrollments. The signing at UCC 3-104.1, which if "unconditional", at
UCC 3-104.2 gives agency police power to access your property by executing negotiable
"dishonored" instruments of "promise" per UCC 3-104.3. This
applies to all “persons”, such as, all commercial entities, corporations,
governments, and every other “thing” that legally falls into the description of
“person”, but not the Freeborn People.
All "IMPLIED
POWERS" are "vested" by the Negotiable Instrument Law and
enforced by the Uniform Commercial Code at 3-104 (1) Signing, and (2) Unconditional,
and (3) Promise.
Negotiable
Instruments of the categories of W-2 forms, Marriage Licenses, Driver License, Dog
License, Social Security License (#123-45-6789), etc., etc., presumed to be
voluntary, knowingly, willingly and intentionally signed by the Citizen,
initiate the "implied powers" of the Article I Legislative Branch to
be "engrafted" upon Article II Executive to collect the tax with
"implied" police power, but offers no delict to destroy diversity of
Citizenship. The dolus bogus "contract" initiating Article II
Executive police power, together with Article I Legislative "statutes"
as the other "implied" power creates third party instruments
"presumed" to obligate the parties signed upon any such
"contracts"."
EXHIBIT_020_-_NOTICE_Penumbra_Doctrine_Does_NOT_Apply.doc
BTW, as this is all about negotiable instruments under the
UCC, then even if we don't reserve our rights, we can assert our UCC rights,
i.e. demand that they 1) identify themselves (by name and DOB of the
person/agency), and 2) produce proof of their authority, and of their Holder in
Due Course status.
I.e. every time that an agent of some muni corporation
demands payment or performance, it might be considered a PRESENTMENT under UCC
3-501.
