Showing posts with label Democrats. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Democrats. Show all posts

Friday, November 22, 2013

Mainstream press will never print this!!!

Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 10:49:02 -0700
Subject: [Fwd: Fw: Welfare Map ( Be sure to read this from top to bottom )]

READ THIS!!!!!!!!!!!!!

---------------------------- Original Message ----------------------------
Subject: Fw: Welfare Map  ( Be sure to read this from top to bottom )
 
 
 
*Please forward to all likeminded people that want to know what̢۪s really
going on *
 
    THE NEW WELFARE MAP

    Make sure you read to the bottom...
 
    Quite an eye opener…
  
    These 11 States now have More People on Welfare than they do Employed!
 
    Last month, the Senate Budget Committee reports that in fiscal year
2012, between food stamps, housing support, child care, Medicaid and
other benefits, the average U.S. Household below the poverty line
received $168.00 a day in government support. What's the problem with
that much support? Well, the median household income in America is
just over $50,000,which averages out to $137.13 a day. To put it
another way, being on welfare now pays the equivalent of $30.00 an
hour for a 40-hour week, while the average job pays $20.00 an hour.
 
                    Furthermore:
 
    There are actually two messages here.  The first is very
 
    interesting, but the second is absolutely astounding - and explains a
lot.
               A recent "Investor's Business Daily" article provided very
 
    interesting statistics from a survey by the United Nations International
 
    Health Organization.
Percentage of men and women who surviv a cancer five years after diagnosis: 
 
                U.S.                  65%
 
                England               46%
 
                Canada                42%
 
 
  Percentage of patients diagnosed with  diabetes who received treatment within six months:
 
                U.S.                 93%
  
               England               15%
  
               Canada                43%
 
  Percentage of seniors needing hip replacement who received it within six months:
 
                U.S.                  90%
 
                England               15%
 
                Canada                43%
 
 
  Percentage referred to a medical specialist who see one within one month:
 
                U.S.                  77%
 
                England               40%
 
                Canada                43%
 
 Number of MRI scanners (a prime diagnostic tool) per million people:
 
                U.S.                 71
 
                England              14
 
                Canada               18

 
Percentage of seniors (65+), with low income, who say they are in "excellent health":
 
                U.S.                  12%
 
                England                2%
 
                Canada                6%
 
 
And now for the last statistic:
  
               National Health Insurance?
 
                U.S.                 NO
 
                England             YES
 
                Canada              YES

 
               Check this last set of statistics!!
  
  The percentage of each past president's cabinet who had worked in the private business sector prior to their appointment to the cabinet.
 
    You know what the private business sector is; a real-life business, not a government job.  Here are the percentages.
 
               T. Roosevelt.................... 38%
 
               Taft............................ 40%
 
               Wilson ......................... 52%
 
               Harding......................... 49%
 
               Coolidge........................ 48%
 
               Hoover ......................... 42%
 
               F. Roosevelt.................... 50%
 
               Truman.......................... 50%
 
               Eisenhower................. .... 57%
 
               Kennedy......................... 30%
 
               Johnson......................... 47%
 
               Nixon........................... 53%
 
               Ford............................ 42%
 
               Carter.......................... 32%
 
               Reagan.......................... 56%
 
               GH Bush......................... 51%
 
               Clinton ........................ 39%
 
               GW Bush......................... 55%
 
               Obama............................ 8%
 
 
       This helps to explain the incompetence of this administration:
 
Only 8% of them have ever worked in private business!
 
That's right!  Only eight percent---the least, by far of the last 19 presidents!  And these people are      trying to tell our big corporations how to run their  business?
 
 How can the president of a major nation and society, the one with the most successful economic system in 
world history, stand and talk about business when he'snever worked for one?  Or about jobs when he has neverreally had one?  And when it's the same for 92% of hissenior staff and closest advisers?  They've spent mostof their time in academia, government and/or non-profit jobs or as "community organizers."
 
    They should have been in an employment line.
 
  Pass this on because we'll NEVER see these facts in the main stream media!

Wednesday, February 8, 2012

1% TAX ON SS CHECKS This will get you going...


Direct Deposit for SS check 


ON JANUARY 1ST 2012, THE GOVERNMENT IS REQUIRING EVERYONE TO HAVE DIRECT DEPOSIT FOR SS CHECKS. WONDER WHY?
1% tax on all bank transactions HR4646


Your income tax isn't enough for them. They got to gouge you another 1%.
Watch for this AFTER November elections; remember this        BEFORE you VOTE in case you think Obama's looking out for your best interest. 
        1% tax on all bank transactions HR 4646 
        This government just cannot think of enough ways to hurt the American people! I sure hope this dies!!!!!

        FORWARD THIS TO EVERYONE YOU KNOW! 
        1% tax on all bank transactions HR 4646 - ANOTHER NEW OBAMA TAX SLIPPED        IN WHILE WE WERE ASLEEP. Checked this on snopes, it's true! Check out HR 4646.




President Obama's finance team is recommending a one percent (1%) transaction fee (TAX). Obama's plan is to sneak it in after the November elections to keep it under the radar.


        This is a 1% tax on all transactions at any financial institution - banks, credit unions, savings and loans, etc. Any deposit you make, or even a transfer within your account, will have a 1% tax charged. ~If your paycheck or your social security or whatever is direct deposit, it will get a 1% tax charged for the transaction. ~If your paycheck is $1000, then you will pay Obama $10 just for the privilege of depositing your paycheck in your bank. Even if you hand carry your paycheck or any check into your bank for a deposit, 1% tax will be charged. ~You receive a $5,000 stock dividend from your broker, Obama takes $50 just to allow you to deposit that check in the bank.. ~If you take $1,000 cash to deposit at your bank, 1% tax will be charged. 
        Mind you, this is from the man who promised that, if you make under $250,000 per year, you will not see one penny of new tax. Keep your eyes and ears open, you will be amazed at what you learn about this guy's under-the-table moves to increase the number of ways you are taxed. 
        Oh, and by the way, if you receive a refund from the IRS next year and you have it direct deposited or you walk in to deposit that check, you guessed it. You will pay a 1% charge of that money just for putting it in your bank. Remember, any money, cash, check or whatever, no matter where it came from, you will pay a 1% fee if you put it in the bank.


        Some will say, oh well, it's just 1%. Are you kidding me? It's a 1% tax increase across the board. Remember, once the tax is there, they can also raise it at will. And if anyone protests, they will just say, "Oh,that's not really a tax, it's a user fee"! Think this is no big deal? 


Go back and look at the transactions you made on one year's banking statements. Then add the total of all those transactions and deduct 1%. Still think it's no big deal?


" A government big enough to give you everything you want is also big enough to take away everything you have." - Barry  Goldwater

Friday, January 20, 2012

You lost 1st, 5th and 6th Amendment Rights Now your 2nd Amendment gone.


Why Grandpa carries a gun.
Please take time to read this and pay particular attention to "A Little Gun History" about half way down.

Why Grandpa carries a gun scroll way down
PEOPLE ASK WHY?

Why Carry a Gun?
 My old grandpa said to me 'Son, there comes a time in every man's life when he stops bustin' knuckles and starts bustin' caps and usually it's when he becomes too old to take an ass whoopin.'

>I don't carry a gun to kill people.
>I carry a gun to keep from being killed.
> 
>I don't carry a gun to scare people.
>I carry a gun because sometimes this world can be a scary place.
> 
>I don't carry a gun because I'm paranoid.
>I carry a gun because there are real threats in the world.
>
>I don't carry a gun because I'm evil.
>I carry a gun because I have lived long enough to see the evil in the world.
>
>I don't carry a gun because I hate the government.
>I carry a gun because I understand the limitations of government.
>
>I don't carry a gun because I'm angry.
>I carry a gun so that I don't have to spend the rest of my life hating myself for failing to be prepared.
>
>I don't carry a gun because I want to shoot someone.
>I carry a gun because I want to die at a ripe old age in my bed, and not on a sidewalk somewhere tomorrow afternoon.
>
>I don't carry a gun because I'm a cowboy.
>I carry a gun because, when I die and go to heaven, I want to be a cowboy.
>
>I don't carry a gun to make me feel like a man.
>I carry a gun because men know how to take care of themselves and the ones they love.
>      
>I don't carry a gun because I feel inadequate.
>I carry a gun because unarmed and facing three armed thugs, I am inadequate.      
>
>I don't carry a gun because I love it.
>I carry a gun because I love life and the people who make it meaningful to me.      
>
>Police protection is an oxymoron.
>Free citizens must protect themselves.
>Police do not protect you from crime, they usually just investigate the crime after it happens and then call someone in to clean up the mess.
>      
>Personally, I carry a gun because I'm too young to die
>and too old to take an ass whoopin'.....author unknown (but obviously brilliant)
>      
>**********************************************
>A LITTLE GUN HISTORY
> 
>In 1929, the Soviet Union established gun control.      
>From 1929 to 1953, about 20 million dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
>       ------------------------------
> 
>In 1911, Turkey established gun control.
>From 1915 to 1917, 1.5 million Armenians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.      
> ------------------------------
> 
>Germany established gun control in 1938 and from 1939 to 1945, a total of 13 million Jews and others who were unable to defend themselves were rounded up and exterminated.
> ------------------------------      
> 
>China established gun control in 1935.
>From 1948 to 1952, 20 million political dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
>       ------------------------------
> 
>Guatemala established gun control in 1964.
>From 1964 to 1981, 100,000 Mayan Indians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.       
> 
>Uganda established gun control in 1970.
>From 1971 to 1979, 300,000 Christians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.       
> 
>Cambodia established gun control in 1956.
>From1975 to 1977, one million educated people, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
>       -----------------------------
> 
>Defenseless people rounded up and exterminated
>in the 20th Century because of gun control: 56 million.
>------------------------------
>
>You won't see this data on the US evening news, or hear politicians disseminating this information.
> 
>Guns in the hands of honest citizens save lives and property
>and, yes, gun-control laws adversely affect only the law-abiding citizens.
> 
>Take note my fellow Americans, before it's too late!
> 
>The next time someone talks in favor of gun control, please remind them of this history lesson.
> 
>With guns, we are 'citizens'.      
>Without them, we are 'subjects'.
>
>During WW II the Japanese decided not to invade America because they knew most Americans were ARMED!
> 
>If you value your freedom, please spread this anti gun-control message to all of your friends.      
>
>The purpose of fighting is to win.      
> 
>There is no possible victory in defense.      
> 
>The sword is more important than the shield, and skill is more important than either.
> 
>The final weapon is the brain.
> 
>All else is supplemental.      
> 
>SWITZERLAND ISSUES EVERY HOUSEHOLD A GUN!      
>SWITZERLAND'S GOVERNMENT TRAINS EVERY ADULT THEY ISSUE A RIFLE.      
>SWITZERLAND HAS THE LOWEST GUN RELATED
>CRIME RATE OF ANY CIVILIZED COUNTRY IN THE WORLD!!!
> 
>IT'S A NO BRAINER!      
>DON'T LET OUR GOVERNMENT WASTE MILLIONS OF OUR TAX DOLLARS      
>IN AN EFFORT TO MAKE ALL LAW ABIDING CITIZENS AN EASY TARGET.      
>
>I'm a firm believer in the 2nd Amendment!
>If you are too, please forward

Sunday, November 20, 2011

Why did Obama closed down auto dealerships?



> CHRYSLER'S DIRTY STORY!! UNBELIEVABLE!!!
>
>
> Sooner or later this will all come to light!
>
>
> This could be a scandal of epic proportions and one that makes Nixon's Watergate
or Clinton's Monica Lewinsky affair pale by comparison.
>
> Why was there neither rhyme nor reason as to which dealerships of the Chrysler
Corporation were to be closed?
>
> Roll the clock back to the weeks just before Chrysler declared bankruptcy.
Chrysler, like GM, was in dire financial straits and OUR federal government
"graciously" offered to "buy the company" and keep them out of bankruptcy and
"save jobs."
>
> Chrysler was, in the words of Obama and his administration, "Too big to fail,"
same story with GM.
>
> The feds organized their "Automotive Task Force" to fix Chrysler and GM. Obama,
in an act that is 100% unconstitutional, appointed a guy named Steve Rattner to
be the White House's official Car Czar - literally, that's what his title is.
>
> Rattner is the liaison between Obama, Chrysler, and GM.
>
> Initially, the national media reported that Chrysler 'had made this list of
dealerships'. Not true!
>
> The Washington Examiner, Newsmax, Fox News and a host of other n ews agencies
discovered that the list of dealerships was put together by the "Automotive Task
Force" headed by no one other than Mr. Steve Rattner.
>
> Now the plot thickens.
>
> Remember earlier we said that there was neither rhyme nor reason why certain
dealerships were closed?
>
> Actually there's a very interesting pattern as to who was closed down. Again, on
May 27, 2009, The Washington Examiner and Newsmax exposed the connection.
>
> Amazingly, of the 789 dealerships closed by the federal government, 788 had
donated money, exclusively to Republican political causes, while contributing
nothing to Democratic political causes.
>
> The only "Democratic" dealership on the list was found to have donated $7,700 to
Hillary's campaign, and a bit over $2,000 to John Edwards.
> This same dealership, reportedly, also gave $20000 to Obama's campaign.
>
> Does that seem a little odd to you?
>
> Steve Rattner is the guy who put the list together . Well, he happens to be
married to a Maureen White. Maureen happens to be the former national finance
chairman of the Democratic National Committee. As such, she has access to
campaign donation records from everyone in the nation Republican or Democrat.
But of course, this is just a wacky "coincidence," we're certain.
>
> Then comes another really wacky "coincidence."
>
> On that list of dealerships being closed down, a weird thing happened in
Arkansas, North Louisiana, and Southern Missouri. It seems that Bill Clinton's
former White House Chief of Staff, Mack McClarty, owns a chain of dealerships in
that region, partnered with a fellow by the name of Robert Johnson.
>
> Johnson happens to be founder of Black Entertainment Television and was a huge
Obama supporter and financier.
>
> These guys own a half dozen Chrysler stores under the company title of
RLJ-McClarty-Landers.. Interestingly, none of their dealerships were ordered
closed - not one! While a ll of their competing Chrysler/Dodge and Jeep
dealership were!
>
> Eight dealerships located near the dealerships owned by McClarty and Johnson were
ordered shut down. Thus by pure luck, these two major Obama supporters now have
virtual monopoly on Chrysler sales in their zone. Isn't that amazing?
>
> Go look in The Washington Examiner, the story's there, and it's in a dozen or so
other web-based news organizations; this isn't being made up.
>
> Now if you thought Chrysler was owned by Fiat, you are mistaken. Under the
federal court ruling, 65% of Chrysler is now owned by the federal government and
the United Auto Workers union! Fiat owns 20%. The other 15% is still privately
owned and presumably will be traded on the stock market.
>
> Obama smiles and says he doesn't want to run the auto industry.
>
> As horrifying as this is to comprehend, and being as how this used to be the
United States of America, it would appear that the president has the power to
destroy private businesses and eliminate upwards of 100,000 jobs just because
they don't agree with his political agenda There are voices in Washington
demanding an explanation, but the "Automotive Task Force" has released no
information to the public or to any of the senators demanding answers for what
has been done.
>
> Keep your ear to the ground for more on this story. If you've ever wanted to
make a difference about anything in your life, get on the phone to your national
senator or representative in the House and demand an investigation into this.
>
> Benjamin Franklin had it right when he said, "All that's necessary for evil to
triumph is for good men to do nothing."
>
> Car Czar No More
>
> An amazing thing happened as this story was going to press. Obama's Car Czar,
Steve Rattner, resigned on July 13 and was promptly replaced by former steel
workers union boss Ron Bloom.
>
> According to CBS News, Rattner left "to return to private life and spend time
with his family."
>
> Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner said, "I hope that he takes another opportunity
to bring his unique skills to government service in the future."
>
> By the way, Rattner is under investigation for a multi-million dollar pay-to-play
investment bank scandal in New York.
>
> Uh-oh!
>
> But, we're certain that had nothing to do with his resignation. And, according
to several news sources out there, there are rumors he's being investigated for
what could be pay-to-play scandal involving the closing of Chrysler and GM
dealerships. Really?
>
> Again, that couldn't have anything to with his resignation-that's ridiculous!
Like CBS said, this guy just wants to "spend more quality time with his family."
>
> Obama has 32 personally appointed "czars" who answer to no one but him, all of
whom are acting without any Constitutional authority. But hey, we're sure they
all have "unique skills,"... as Tim Geithner likes to say!
>
> SOOOOO, HOW'S THAT HOPE AND CHANGE WORKING FOR YA?
>
> Check it out at the following websites:
>
> http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/Furor-grows-over-partisan-car-dealer-closings-46261447.html
>
> http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/Furor-grows-over-partisan-car-dealer-closings-462
61447.html
>
> This goes from beyond corruption in high places - to gross criminal actions on
the part of our government!
>
> I hope you will spread this far and wide, and hopefully the taxpaying public will
demand some of that transparency we were promised...... followed by criminal
prosecution of the perpetrators!
>
> WAKE UP AMERICANS!!!


Ralph and Roxy Mills